Skip to content

Super Bowl Searches

While advertisers seem to have that it makes eminent sense to put your television ads–especially your –online, is making the case that many advertisers did not fully leverage their TV spots by extending their ad campaigns online. Their [PDF] is a fascinating look at how some Super Bowl advertisers capitalized on Super Bowl related searches to extend their ad campaigns online.

Reprisemedia reports which Super Bowl advertisers bought what search keyword ads and sponsorships on the three major search engines, , , and . Considering that they only address paid search advertising and not the natural search results, I don’t know how fair it is for them to label "winners" and "losers", but it’s interesting nonetheless.

For example, people often search using well-known brand names. If someone looking for the Super Bowl ad searches using the word "Pepsi," they’ll find a link in the natural results to Pepsi.com and when they go to the site, there is a link on the front page for TV commercials. But Pepsi hasn’t bought any search engine advertising for the keyword "Pepsi"–nor should they have–so is that considered poor search marketing? I say not at all; that’s smart.

Relatedly, provides fascinating insight into search behavior in the wake of a singularly unique popular culture touchstone event. On the Saturday before the Super Bowl, Buzz Index posted a review of and yesterday they posted a review of performed on Super Bowl weekend. Take a look at in Yahoo! Buzz to see overall Super Bowl related searches; then go to the and to see the leaders and movers in those categories.

Finally, Search Engine Watch has posted an article detailing some of the .

Similar Posts:

About David Erickson

David Erickson is principal of e-Strategy Media, a digital marketing consultancy based in Minnesota. David has extensive experience in digital marketing and is often used as an expert source by media and asked to speak on the topic before organizations and to sit on panel discussions.

Scroll To Top